Author: Miguel A. Ballicora
Date: 13:50:24 04/17/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 17, 2001 at 02:32:49, Christophe Theron wrote: >On April 17, 2001 at 01:57:08, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote: > >>On April 17, 2001 at 00:51:09, Christophe Theron wrote: >> >>>On April 16, 2001 at 21:54:23, Fernando Villegas wrote: >>> >>>>Christophe: [snip] >>> >>>The general audience is probably going to swallow the idea of "World champion >>>against World champion". The formula is simple enough and the communication work >>>will be easier. >>> >>>But what will people think when they learn that actually the program which has >>>played is not really the best out there? >>> >> >>Objection! :-) you are speculating. You are talking like is was proven that >>Shredder is not the best. >>Anyway, it is irrelevant. Kramnik is not even the best out there. So? >>You guys are losing the sporting side of this. A Champion is >>a Champion, period. > >If we are talking about sport, we are talking about fairness. What's not fair about shredder being a Champion? Regards, Miguel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.