Author: Gabor Szots
Date: 00:20:09 04/18/01
Go up one level in this thread
>My point is that the title belongs to the August 2000 version of Shredder. > >The newer versions do not own any World title at all. Yes, even the day after Shredder won, he did not own the world title any longer. There should have been another WCCC immediately. And let's organize WCCC's until Shredder doesn't win, then we can claim we said it was not the best. This qualification is only for those hoping to replace Shredder for jealousy, greed, marketing (money) reasons. Besides, does the 2001 version of Kramnyik own a World title? By your argument, only if he hasn't learned and hasn't forgotten anything. > >On the other hand, there have been several major releases of several other major >chess programs. It is highly probable that some of them is better than Shredder. And of course it is highly improbable that Shredder has been improved ever since. > >But remember that the company which sells Shredder has forbidden the SSDF to >publish any result of this program. > >This is where the twist is. If Shredder had been tested, most probably he would >not top the list. And today the idea that Shredder should play Kramnik would >seem highly biased. This is not an argument, this is a claim. Unbiased, of course. Gábor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.