Author: Thomas Lagershausen
Date: 15:11:37 04/18/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 18, 2001 at 16:24:14, Mike S. wrote: >On April 18, 2001 at 13:35:44, Mogens Larsen wrote: > >>That is a very commendable attitude, but as a wildcard entry you didn't have >>anything to lose. So the laissez-faire attitude is somewhat free IMO. > >Until now, I had the impression that you are a person who writes reasonable, and >sometimes quite humorous IIRC, messages. Oh Mike you understand to less. > >Did you now call Deep Junior a "wildcard entry"? What is this based upon? No worldchampiontitel since 1997 no tournamentwin since the speedtourny of enrique a very ugly style of chess positional a weak program in comparison with fritz,shredder and tiger lots of ugly games ( do you want examples?) the stupid game against kramnik in dortmund 2000 on a4-way-machine etc,etc,etc > >I can imagine that you wouldn't call Deep Shredder a wildcard entry - me >neither. how can you compare junior with the worldchampion shredder? But who has played so far, and won, an event of a comparable size and >importance to that Braingames aim for? *Deep Blue* only did this when it beat >Kasparov. > >People should start to realise the dimension of what is planned here. we do this, but you agree to a wildcard for junior. > >Keeping the conditions in mind which were told to us, Deep Junior fully deserves >to participate in this qualifying. Who doubts this? Here we are.All people with a good clubniveau hate junior. It plays such a ugly computerchess. It isn't an act of grace to >invite it, this happened in view of it's rank among chess programs, haha. The tiger would make win after win against this wildcardprogram. it's >strength and of the successes it already has had against human masters, >obviously. The games in dortmund were very,very poor. Lots of Kh1-g1 and Kg1-h1 moves. brrrrr what an stupid chess. It hurts my eyes.No more juniorgames in my life. It doesn't depend on a "wildcard". Can we proof this? We don´t believe it.It is for sure that tiger is two classes better, especialy against humans. > >I think this kind of talk isn't necessary. i hope that too. What an unverified opinion. Thomas Lagershausen > >Regards, >M.Scheidl
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.