Author: Chessfun
Date: 15:17:41 04/18/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 17, 2001 at 15:51:28, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On April 17, 2001 at 14:00:58, Chessfun wrote: >Of course it will be allowed. It would be a complete joke if a stranger would be >operating the engine in the actual match as well or not allowed to modify >settings between games. It's not an autoplay match with a dummy. You already think it's a complete joke...no? therefore without SMK would it be a complete complete joke?. >Yes, they are, because it's a tournament format. As I once explained to you, >different methods of engine-engine matchups measures different things. Each >method has its weaknesses and strengths. A lot of games with inferior setup >isn't necessarily better than fewer games with optimal settings. A combination >is clearly better, but it won't happen. Of course they measure different things. I have said from the start the best comp v comp engine regardless of how it's determined don't mean a thing playing a human. How will the settings not be optimal without the programmer? The settings will be as they should be, as the released verion is. >>It's a match word it any way you choose to make it seem like a >>tournament, but it's still a match. A match that has a number of >>elements absent from regular events. > >I'm not quite sure what you're trying to say here. The final match between >Kramnik and the challenger will be in tournament format roughly similar to ICCA >events and DB-Kasparov. I am talking about the qualifying event not the Kramnik match. There are two programs play Deep's Fritz and Junior. Sarah.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.