Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Support 4 single chip chess v Kramnik

Author: Mogens Larsen

Date: 18:42:19 04/18/01

On April 18, 2001 at 18:11:28, Chessfun wrote:

>The distributor does yes. But how does the distributor stck the deck
>when the choices are made by two independant people?

A choice isn't difficult to make when you have nothing to lose by saying yes,
which the comment by Amir Ban proves. And need I remind you that these two were
the only likely candidates to accept the invitation given the circumstances?

Mogens.

Re: Support 4 single chip chess v Kramnik Chessfun 20:51:36 04/18/01
- Re: Support 4 single chip chess v Kramnik Mogens Larsen 03:37:35 04/19/01
  - Re: Support 4 single chip chess v Kramnik Chessfun 17:36:58 04/19/01
    - Re: Support 4 single chip chess v Kramnik Mogens Larsen 03:57:00 04/20/01
      - Re: Support 4 single chip chess v Kramnik Chessfun 09:11:55 04/20/01
        
        Re: Support 4 single chip chess v Kramnik Mogens Larsen 10:07:40 04/20/01
        
        Re: Support 4 single chip chess v Kramnik Chessfun 13:39:06 04/20/01
        
        Re: Support 4 single chip chess v Kramnik Mogens Larsen 14:52:18 04/20/01
        
        Re: Support 4 single chip chess v Kramnik Bertil Eklund 15:51:58 04/20/01
        
        Re: Support 4 single chip chess v Kramnik Mogens Larsen 17:28:33 04/20/01
        
        Re: Support 4 single chip chess v Kramnik (small correction) Mogens Larsen 17:37:06 04/20/01
        
        Re: Support 4 single chip chess v Kramnik Bertil Eklund 15:26:48 04/20/01
    - Re: Support 4 single chip chess v Kramnik Robert Hyatt 19:06:44 04/19/01
      - Re: Support 4 single chip chess v Kramnik Chessfun 22:22:14 04/19/01
        
        Re: Support 4 single chip chess v Kramnik Robert Hyatt 06:08:50 04/20/01

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.