Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 11:45:06 04/03/98
Go up one level in this thread
On April 03, 1998 at 04:20:20, Moritz Berger wrote: >+44 =28 -9 for Fritz (72%) Your big numbers do not show anything. It only shows what I said before: there is a big cheat in those results. I don't care if the cheating comes from you or from the SPECIAL fritz5-autoplayer-version. I don't care. You can claim it would be 1000:0 Fritz5 vs. CStal and I would not believe it. There is a big lie somewhere, and I will find out where. This whole fritz5-affair stinks to heaven. First the ssdf-guys are unable to test hiarcs accurate, and suddenly they serve a second - best program a fast machine, big hash, special software and over all: special conditions. No formel1 racing allows a special team those advantages. Sorry, but the ssdf list hast lost all credibility and it is over. No one will ever believe in this list again. Cheating from cheaters for people who want to read lies. Anyone gets what he deserves. The stupid readers who believe anything get Fritz and ChessBase and Computer-Schach & Spiele, and their publishers believe that their readers are stupid, in fact they write the level as low that the most stupid guys can understand their lies. Pah - making money - making money - making money . Thats all. Prostetution for the money and brainwashing the customers. Not my society, not my ideals. If you get it, it seems you deserve it. No wonder. Hail Microsoft ! Hail ChessBase ! Where do YOU want to go today ?
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.