Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 13:18:16 04/03/98
Go up one level in this thread
On April 03, 1998 at 14:45:06, Thorsten Czub wrote: >Your big numbers do not show anything. >It only shows what I said before: >there is a big cheat in those results. >I don't care if the cheating comes from you or from the SPECIAL >fritz5-autoplayer-version. >I don't care. > >You can claim it would be 1000:0 Fritz5 vs. CStal and I would not >believe it. > >There is a big lie somewhere, and I will find out where. >This whole fritz5-affair stinks to heaven. First the ssdf-guys are >unable to test hiarcs accurate, and suddenly they serve a second - best >program a >fast machine, big hash, special software and over all: special >conditions. > >No formel1 racing allows a special team those advantages. > >Sorry, but the ssdf list hast lost all credibility and >it is over. No one will ever believe in this list again. > >Cheating from cheaters for people who want to read lies. >Anyone gets what he deserves. Cheaters, liers... Not character assasins? :) >The stupid readers Oh yes, stupid... > who believe anything get Fritz and ChessBase and >Computer-Schach & Spiele, and their publishers believe that their >readers are stupid, in fact they write the level as low that the most >stupid guys can understand their lies. >Pah - making money - making money - making money . >Thats all. Prostetution for the money and brainwashing the customers. > >Not my society, not my ideals. > >If you get it, it seems you deserve it. >No wonder. > >Hail Microsoft ! Hail ChessBase ! > >Where do YOU want to go today ? A model of scientific research. Data, relation, theory. Above all, objectivity. Enlightening. Enrique
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.