Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:24:54 04/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 19, 2001 at 06:59:34, stuart taylor wrote: >On April 19, 2001 at 06:51:26, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >>[D]8/8/8/6Np/2N5/Pk6/6K1/8 w - - 0 1 >> >>Analysis ChessTiger 14.0 with TBs (4+5-pieces) and 96 MB Hash on a P600: >> >>00:00:20.1 6,62 14 5162472 Ne5 Kxa3 Kg3 h4+ Kh3 Ka4 Ng4 Ka3 Ne6 Kb4 Nf4 Ka4 Nd5 >>Ka3 Ndf6 >>00:02:18.2 6,60 15 37335234 Ne5 Kxa3 Kg3 h4+ Kh3 Ka4 Ng4 Ka3 Ne6 Kb4 Nf4 Ka4 Nd5 >>Ka3 Ne7 Kb4 >> >>This is draw (or a mate in 100 moves :)! >> >>Win move are 1. Nf3 or 1.Ne4 >> >>Eduard > >Are we saying that the new Tiger updates are NOT a significant strength increase >as had been claimed? No The fact that tiger cannot solve some rare positions because of wrong knowledge does not prove that the new tiger is not a significant strength increase. I guess that the fact that tiger cannot solve some positions like the position that was posted is reducing the rating of tiger by less than 5 rating points. Uri > Will an additional corrective patch insure that it IS? >S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.