Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 05:04:15 04/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 19, 2001 at 07:09:47, Bertil Eklund wrote: >Hi! Hello Bertil, >First one question are you going to be a politician? Nowadays I can't see you >writing anything else then demagogy, speculations, wild guessing, sweet dreams >and heavy accusations. That's nonsense and you know it. So far every public message from either SMK, Amir Ban and yourself have supported my "wild guessing". And judging according to known principles of proper behaviour may seem as demagogy by you, but there are rules and governing bodies for a reason. >First of all I believe all wanted Shredder to compare. If you are sure that >isn't the case, prove it or at least make it sound without doubt. I never claimed that people don't want to see Shredder compete. But I'm quite sure that most are capable of comprehending that a title means something. And that if you want to challenge it, then the arrangement must be credible according to specific rules. An arbitrary selection or the introduction of an alternative World Championship isn't the correct way to accomplish that. That is fact and without a doubt. >You seems to know more then me and other parties involved about the >negociations, if so enlightens me/us. I try to interpret what is written and relate it to the schematics of a decision process. We know that you selected the programs and we know that BGN created an alternativ WC. Using the information posted by Millennium, you, SMK and Amir Ban creates a reasonable overview of the events. From the initial contact over the surprise qualifier with the obvious refusal from Millennium to the acceptance by Amir ban. None of the individual elements, when examined in detail, implies fair play. >A little hint if you believe what mr Weiner wrote on his site, I can guarantee >that you have been fooled more then any first of April. Please enlighten me about the erroneous statements in the text about the livingroom tournament and when I've used them inaccurately. >If you don't know Cadaques it is a small town but it is bigger then one house >with a livingroom. There is hotels, they have papers in the country (Spain) and >journalists and as far as I know they have communications, in example >telephones, motorways, airports and I have heard that some people have Internet >too. What's your point? The city of Cadaques is irrelevant to making a bogus challenger event. Regards, Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.