Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 06:58:25 04/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 19, 2001 at 08:29:10, Paul Petersson wrote:
>On April 18, 2001 at 13:43:46, Peter Berger wrote:
>
>>On April 18, 2001 at 09:01:59, Paul Petersson wrote:
>>
>>>On April 18, 2001 at 00:30:01, Peter Berger wrote:
>>>
>>>>It boils down to a simple question : why don't they simply take Shredder 5 or
>>>>Deep Shredder NOW , test it and post the results on their list now ?
>>>
>>>It's already on the list. All the testers know the rating of S5. The fact that
>>>it's not on the official list is all because of one man and his actions and
>>>behaviour towards the SSDF.
>>>
>>
>>OK . That's partly good news ; so if the problems could be resolved you could
>>add it without much effort .
>
>Yes, but since they won't it doesn't matter.
>
>>>>
>>>>d.) SSDF rejected and said they only wanted to test Shredder if they could test
>>>>any other program by Millenium , too .
>>>
>>>Ossi Weiner knew the exact conditions long before we started to play with S5. He
>>>didn't agree and now it's to late.
>>
>>How can it be too late ? Shredder 5 too old now ? Well , you recently entered
>>Hiarcs 7.01 on a K6/450 which isn't exactly new either .
>
>No S5 isn't to old, but since Weiner didn't agree, S5/DeepShredder won't be on
>the official list.
>
>>And now there is Deep Shredder which is brand new .
>>
>>Afaik yout kept Shredder's results completely secret , so it can't be the reason
>>for Millenium's recent decisions .
>
>I think you're wrong. Weiner probably understands that S5 wouldn't top the list
>and therefor prefers to keep S5 out of it.
That's so obvious.
Just wait until Shredder does not own the WMCC title anymore (hey, it can happen
you know, you can't win every time), and you will see Mr Weiner's gentle
comeback to the SSDF. ;)
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.