Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Support 4 single chip chess v Kramnik

Author: Bertil Eklund

Date: 09:21:58 04/19/01

Go up one level in this thread







>Probably. They do not have their own interface so they have little
>chance of selling otherwise.
>
>I do not know what Weiner offers but i do not even want to know it,
>it's going to be very little probably.
>
>What chessbase offers is a peanut of course. You can only get great programs
>when programmers can fulltime work at it. Programmers earn when
>working in a company around 50k$ to 100k$ if living in USA
>a year if they're good. To make a chess
>program strong you are a good programmer anyway, very little people can
>make a chessprogram anyway.
>
>When Friedel talked about diep as engine under chessbase (that's
>quite some time ago so i do not know whether they pay more nowadays,
>but as far as i heart not a penny more) he was talking about 5000 or 10000
>dmark, about 4000 us$ today (dollar is high now).
>
>Considering the thousands of hours work that are put in an engine on
>average, that's like 1 us$ an hour.
>
>So from that i can't even internet as i pay a dollar an hour for
>internet already.
>
>I'm not sure how many countries there are on this world where a
>programmer earns 1us$ an hour. Add to that that the sales of an engine
>are probably (my own estimate) like 1/100 of what fritz sells
>as it's so easy to copy a few unprotected .dll and .eng files
>(whereas the fritz engine if loaded always begs for cdrom here,
>then i must locate that cdrom first etc, in short why is fritz
>better protected anyway? More users use it so more trouble. More logical
>would be to protect the programs and not fritz, unless is perhaps
>has to do with smart marketing?).
>
>Now Weiner is not a hair better from business viewpoint i've heart
>from rumours, i'll not write what i heart
>about whether he pays programmers at all, but let's refer to the paper
>i got at world champs 1999 from Ossi Weiner. There was stated that the best
>'amateur' engine would get 20000 DMARK. Yet despite that many engines
>are running under Ossi Weiner software i never have seen announcement on his
>homepage who received that 20000 dmark... ...i don't need to mention that
>Ossi never answerred some emails where i asked whether already an engine
>was selected (i emailed in the year 2000) ...and even worse i didn't
>hear a word from collegue programmers.
>
>And sure for so much programming 20k isn't much...
>
>Amazingly many programmers keep accepting those low offers. How do you
>compete with an easily copyable gambit tiger 2 (read my own definition
>of what free is in this context) for chessbase?
>
>Note i do not know what they paid Christophe to spread a simplistic
>copyable gambit tiger 2 engine. it is non of my business and i would
>sure not post it here if i knew.
>
>But if Amir and Christophe got what i think they have gotten, then
>i would fall laughing from my chair.
>
>Doing nothing in some kind of burocracy job with loads of sparetime
>here probably earns already better...
>
>In the meantime the circle has again been completed as in the meantime
>the interface of chessbase keeps improving... ...where f5.32 compared
>to other games (non-chess) looked designed by a child, though having
>a lot of functionality, nowadays the interface is really good. Hard
>to make for *any* good graphics programmer. Not to mention a non-grpahics
>programmer like me, Ban, Donninger, Theron and the list can go on.
>
>Then i still didn't talk about the problems of making a good commercial
>interface for a chessprogram, as those words 'good commercial interface'
>are completely different from pushing a few buttons in delphi or java.
>
>I'm still working on mine. It works cool now, but i have still loads
>of work ahead as i can't of course release an interface which is having
>similar functionality to interfaces of a few years ago!
>
>Add to that that the average chessprogrammer is very lazy and you know
>they never are going to have their own interface, so the circle is
>round and they get back to those who offered them a
>peanut (from my viewpoint for the work invested).
>
>Now to my big surprise we get chessbase or chessbase against kramnik!
>
>Best regards,
>Vincent

Thank you Vincent for a very good and interesting post!

Bertil



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.