Author: Mark Young
Date: 18:11:09 04/03/98
Go up one level in this thread
On April 03, 1998 at 14:45:06, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>On April 03, 1998 at 04:20:20, Moritz Berger wrote:
>
>>+44 =28 -9 for Fritz (72%)
>
>Your big numbers do not show anything.
>It only shows what I said before:
>there is a big cheat in those results.
>I don't care if the cheating comes from you or from the SPECIAL
>fritz5-autoplayer-version.
>I don't care.
>
>You can claim it would be 1000:0 Fritz5 vs. CStal and I would not
>believe it.
>
>There is a big lie somewhere, and I will find out where.
>
>This whole fritz5-affair stinks to heaven. First the ssdf-guys are
>unable to test hiarcs accurate, and suddenly they serve a second - best
>program a
>fast machine, big hash, special software and over all: special
>conditions.
>
>No formel1 racing allows a special team those advantages.
>
>Sorry, but the ssdf list hast lost all credibility and
>it is over. No one will ever believe in this list again.
>
>Cheating from cheaters for people who want to read lies.
>Anyone gets what he deserves.
>
>The stupid readers who believe anything get Fritz and ChessBase and
>Computer-Schach & Spiele, and their publishers believe that their
>readers are stupid, in fact they write the level as low that the most
>stupid guys can understand their lies.
>Pah - making money - making money - making money .
>Thats all. Prostetution for the money and brainwashing the customers.
>
>Not my society, not my ideals.
>
>If you get it, it seems you deserve it.
>No wonder.
>
>Hail Microsoft ! Hail ChessBase !
>
>Where do YOU want to go today ?
-------------------------------------------------
Lets put this baby to rest once and for all. Lets play a match on ICC or
Fics your Chess System Tal vs Fritz 5 and let the best program win. Is
chess system Tal up to it. Its put up or shut up time.
Mark Young
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.