Author: Peter Berger
Date: 11:00:08 04/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 19, 2001 at 08:29:10, Paul Petersson wrote: >On April 18, 2001 at 13:43:46, Peter Berger wrote: > >>Afaik yout kept Shredder's results completely secret , so it can't be the reason >>for Millenium's recent decisions . > >I think you're wrong. Weiner probably understands that S5 wouldn't top the list >and therefor prefers to keep S5 out of it. > Please understand I won't answer all aspects you mentioned - if some of my points sounded too one-sided it is simply because I only watched your online fights a little and am not involved myself. Basically the details of those fights are none of my business anyway and I already took it too far . I tried to only add things to the list that seemed to get repeated by both sides as facts - I probably failed sometimes as I am no computer ( memory leaks ) but I still think it wasn't too far off . Anyway : this paragraph above you wrote is interesting ( and I haven't read this argument for the first time ) : Are you doing Mr Weiner a favour by adding it to the SSDF list ??? Obviously not - as you don't seem to expect it it to perform too well . Adding Shredder to the list is definitely allowed . You make this list for the customers . Customers like to see it added . You have already tested it in fact . So : what's the problem ? Regards. pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.