Author: Steve Maughan
Date: 12:23:06 04/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
John, From a statistical point of view these results are not significant i.e. you cannot say if this book is any better or worse than the default. Regards, Steve Maughan >Here are the results of testing David Dahlem's Anti-Comp book. This is a pretty >good theory that could use some more exploration. Oddly, though, this book was >the only one to lose a 32-game G/10 match (of the four books I have tested), and >the only one to WIN a 32-game G/60 match. > >32 games at G/10: >CM Default 17.0, CM AntiComp 15.0 (+10 =14 -8) > >32 games at G/60: >CM AntiComp 16.5, CM Default 15.5 (+9 =15 -8) > >So far, of the four books I have tested, I would estimate that either Brian >Kostick's or this one is the strongest. > >If anybody (other than David) wants the PGN files, let me know. > >jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.