Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 14:50:55 04/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 19, 2001 at 14:00:08, Peter Berger wrote:
>On April 19, 2001 at 08:29:10, Paul Petersson wrote:
>
>>On April 18, 2001 at 13:43:46, Peter Berger wrote:
>>
>>>Afaik yout kept Shredder's results completely secret , so it can't be the reason
>>>for Millenium's recent decisions .
>>
>>I think you're wrong. Weiner probably understands that S5 wouldn't top the list
>>and therefor prefers to keep S5 out of it.
>>
>
>Please understand I won't answer all aspects you mentioned - if some of my
>points sounded too one-sided it is simply because I only watched your online
>fights a little and am not involved myself.
>
>Basically the details of those fights are none of my business anyway and I
>already took it too far .
>
>I tried to only add things to the list that seemed to get repeated by both sides
>as facts - I probably failed sometimes as I am no computer ( memory leaks ) but
>I still think it wasn't too far off .
>
>Anyway : this paragraph above you wrote is interesting ( and I haven't read this
>argument for the first time ) :
>
>Are you doing Mr Weiner a favour by adding it to the SSDF list ???
>
>Obviously not - as you don't seem to expect it it to perform too well .
>
>Adding Shredder to the list is definitely allowed .
>
>You make this list for the customers .
>
>Customers like to see it added .
>
>You have already tested it in fact .
>
>So : what's the problem ?
>
>Regards.
>
>pete
Not very hard to guess. They are so pissed off by Weiner that they do not want
to hear about him anymore. And he his happy with the situation so he won't
change a thing.
Bad luck for Stefan, but if he licences his program to another company I guess
they will list it again?
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.