Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 15:11:02 04/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 19, 2001 at 17:51:36, Jeroen van Dorp wrote:
>It seems CCC is talking about nothing but Tiger! :)
>O yeah, and ChessMaster 8000, that's true.
>It seems some programmers have work to do, else we won't know what fritz was in
>a short time....
>
>[D]3Q4/6k1/2N1p3/P1p1pq2/4pb1P/1P6/5P2/5K2 w - - 0 1
>
>Nice to see there are still differences between engines.
>I let Fritz, Hiarcs 7.32, Junior 6, Nimzo 8 and Gandalf 4.32h analyse this
>position. All found the solution in around 18-20 seconds. Junior topped the
>bunch with 13 seconds.
>Also Schredder 4 (can't afford me Schredder 5 with all the useless peripherals I
>don't want or already have :(....) found it very quickly on my PIII@850MHz, 512
>Mb RAM.
>
>But Chess Tiger and especially Gambit Tiger didn't find 1. Qg8+! (1...Kxg8 2.
>Ne7+ Kf7 3.Nxf5 exf5 4. a6! although the program should be able to play 'va
>banque' from time to time......:) (broke off analysis after some 15 minutes)
>
>FWIW, BTW because IMHO YMMV (that's a lot of acronyms). Or I didn't RTFM of
>Gambit Tiger properly? :)
>
>J.
Please try again. I have just setup the position and Tiger has found the
solution. It took quite some time, so it can be that Tiger is the worse on this
position.
On my K6-2 450, 24Mb hash, other stuffs running (Netscape), Tiger solved it in
2mn 50s.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.