Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 15:17:35 04/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 19, 2001 at 17:32:39, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>On April 19, 2001 at 17:01:17, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>Oh no, not you Thorsten!
>
>:-)))
I mean "not you asking this question", of course.
>yes. i do see.
>but why is it propaganda when stefan explains why he did not participate.
>its obvious.
I did not say that Stefan has done propaganda, I just pointed out the fact that
IMO one of his points is moot.
It struck me as soon as I read it, so I wanted to let people know that they were
following without even thinking.
Franckly I have not read the other points carefully.
>enrique and the ssdf claimed to be objective testers.
>IMO they out themselves as the opposite in the whole process of the match.
Don't expect me to say ANYTHING against Enrique or Bertil.
I do not complain against them.
>i don't see your point.
>if he has the program month before, he will learn how to beat it.
>if you create a program than changes itself, you will weaken
>the playing strength of this program.
>rebel-tiger12 is not as strong as gambit-tiger1.
>they have different playing styles.
>and therefore also different strength.
>if you change playing style, the strength changes too.
The difference in playing strength between Chess Tiger and Gambit Tiger is maybe
significant against computers (we do not even know), but I guess that against
human players it is not the same.
I think I could use both programs in order to create an unpredictable opponent,
but that's not the only way to do it.
>>Nobody used his brain to realize that it was not a problem. NOBODY.
>
>it IS a problem IMO. maybe you HAVE a different idea. than please enlighten
>me how you will change the style the way that it plays as strong.
>this is impossible.
You think you know better than me?
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.