Author: john c cook
Date: 15:44:18 04/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 19, 2001 at 17:51:36, Jeroen van Dorp wrote: hi chess player i have amd 1.3 ghz and it found the move in about 45sec not as good as other but it found it >It seems CCC is talking about nothing but Tiger! :) >O yeah, and ChessMaster 8000, that's true. >It seems some programmers have work to do, else we won't know what fritz was in >a short time.... > >[D]3Q4/6k1/2N1p3/P1p1pq2/4pb1P/1P6/5P2/5K2 w - - 0 1 > >Nice to see there are still differences between engines. >I let Fritz, Hiarcs 7.32, Junior 6, Nimzo 8 and Gandalf 4.32h analyse this >position. All found the solution in around 18-20 seconds. Junior topped the >bunch with 13 seconds. >Also Schredder 4 (can't afford me Schredder 5 with all the useless peripherals I >don't want or already have :(....) found it very quickly on my PIII@850MHz, 512 >Mb RAM. > >But Chess Tiger and especially Gambit Tiger didn't find 1. Qg8+! (1...Kxg8 2. >Ne7+ Kf7 3.Nxf5 exf5 4. a6! although the program should be able to play 'va >banque' from time to time......:) (broke off analysis after some 15 minutes) > >FWIW, BTW because IMHO YMMV (that's a lot of acronyms). Or I didn't RTFM of >Gambit Tiger properly? :) > >J.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.