Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 04:48:46 04/04/98
Go up one level in this thread
On April 03, 1998 at 18:24:33, Scott Carmichael wrote: > Interesting that the person who needed no data or proof is suddenly >trying to provide us poor, ignorant readers with it. I have never said this. All I said is that YOU overestimate FACTS as objective. I do not need massive game material to find out about programs. But i can easily produce data like you. It is not complicate to connect 2 pc's and let them run 24h a day. I don't think you are poor. I do think you are ignorant. I don't think you are ignorant because you don't believe me. I think you are ignorant because you believe marketing - advertisment - posts. >I have an idea >Thorsten, why don't you just sit back with the old Fidelity Elite, and >prove to the world how you can use special books to destroy the >credibilty of Mephisto ? I'm sure that we "stupid " readers would find >that about as informative as the rest of your drivel. You can use your sarcasm for your best friends and bore them with it as often as you want. > It's so funny to see you use a person as a reference, only to have >them question your results. Certainly SSDF should fear you replacing >them. I don't want to replace them. I do comment their work. I have always done. And always claimed the same. They have behaved unscientific when they tested hiarcs. > Also, Enrique, please continue with your results, so that we the >sheep recieve quantified data. Pah - he can put his ChessBorg autoplayer games into a trash and post them there. There they can produce WAVES. Who believes in games or statistics a big chess company has manipulated by its own ? Mr Malboro says smoking is not dangerous ?! :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.