Author: Chessfun
Date: 09:11:55 04/20/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 20, 2001 at 06:57:00, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On April 19, 2001 at 20:36:58, Chessfun wrote: > >>The argument is about whether Chessbase stacked the deck as you termed it. > >That was Bob. Correct to which you replied. Therefore is it not natural to conclude you agreed? See http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?164490 >>Whether they negotiated prior to Shredder withdrawl or after I don't see as >>relevant. >Of course it's relevant, because it legitimizes why Junior and Fritz didn't >leave due to unfair conditions. Knowing that Shredder is out and the other one >left is another ChessBase program, which is unlikely to agree to terms different >to yours, is a clear advantage. And the known changes are very limited, which >makes the negotiation claim rather ridiculous. Relevant to what. Who says they would have left either way?. Who's to say they wouldn't have negotiated with Shredder in? And who says they couldn't negotiate with Shredder in? The rules negotiated would have applied to all. Also who's to say even when they negotiated if those terms weren't accepted by BGN that they wouldn't have still accepted the invite. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.