Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 10:48:00 04/04/98
Go up one level in this thread
>This is an example of why I'm a little concerned about this group. > >I don't think anyone should be saying this kind of thing in here. This >goes beyond criticiism of the objectivity of a magazine, it is a pretty >bad personal attack on some real people. There is no "objectivity of a magazine". Your words are a bubble with no content. Show me ONE magazine that has objectivity. A pretty bad personal attack against WHOM ? Whom personal ? >When Rolf make rude comments about you and Chris, Chris went nuts and >had him booted out of here, even though the comments weren't made here. I don't think that rolf was thrown out because he made rude comments on me or chris. He was thrown out because he made rude comments about ccc. Rolf can do any comment about me as often as he wants. >But here is the same kind of attack against someone who has no power >here, and nothing is done, right? Who ? Against whom Bruce ? >What is the story with CCC? > >Are founders allowed to attack anyone they choose, or does this >privilege only exist if they make token apologies afterward? Where is my apology ? I am not privileged more than you. There is no difference in the amount of garbage somebody is allowed to say between a founder and a NON-founder. Your statement that differenciates and relates me as a FOUNDER to show or postulate that i am more privileged than anybody else is a splitting question. The intension of such a splitting rethorics is to avoke that a person A has more rights than other persons NON-A. The reason to relate is to find somewhere in your psychy. If you want to say that I have written bullshit than do it. But do it and not doing mathematics with words and relating things instead of saying it STRAIGHT. > Do they >have to make sure to attack unpopular people? What is free speech Bruce ? Am I allowed to tell in public that I believe that a magazine is betraying their readers ? Is this statement allowed ? Or is it not protected under the free-speech law ? Is it a personal attack ? You are the democrat Bruce...:-) > If I feel like randomly >attacking someone, will I be kicked out, or will I be fine as long as I >attack someone who's unpopular? My experience with Computer Schach and Spiele has nothing to do with people beeing unpopular. I have made my own private experience with a magazine you have only read (sometimes). You were never - as far as I remember - a writer for Computer Schach and Spiele. I was. So you cannot avoke that my attacks against people I have made bad experiences are easy attacks against unpopular people. These people are unpopular because for whatever reasons - and I am not in charge for this. It is their life. I do only talk about my own experience. >Maybe you guys could post a list of people that it is not necessary to >be civil to. > >bruce Would you like to be ON the list or OFF the list ?! :-)
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.