Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 11:45:57 04/20/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 20, 2001 at 14:30:44, Dann Corbit wrote: >On April 20, 2001 at 12:06:53, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>On April 20, 2001 at 11:18:52, Divy wrote: >> >>>I noticed that your original post of the Utz settings has the material value for >>>Knights at 3. You now have it at 5 in a more recent post. Have you changed this >>>setting intentionally? Better results perhaps? >>> >>>-Divy >> >>Sorry, the material value for the Knight is 3 and not 5. > >I have an additional question about your settings. Since a recent post has >shown that there may be some statistical validity to the use of these settings, >I am wondering how did you arrive at them. Trial and error? A systematic >search? A gradient seeking program? Answer K.U. It was a combination of trial and systematic search. The CM8_Rubidio settings made to me a good impression, the games played confirmed that but I was still not satisfied with the results of some practical test positions. So I eventually tried to improve all the program's parameters that in my opinion should have a positive influence to a better mobility. That was all and suddenly the program played very well. Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.