Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 12:36:56 04/20/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 20, 2001 at 12:44:57, Chessfun wrote: >On April 20, 2001 at 08:57:24, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On April 20, 2001 at 08:30:16, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On April 20, 2001 at 05:03:40, Fabio Barrettone wrote: >>> >>>>Well, at last I think so from my experiments with an Athlon 950 256Mb of RAM. >>>>I've done 400 games against Yace (at 40/10m, sorry not too much time for longer >>>>time controls) with default settings and the result was 59% vs 41% in favor of >>>>Gambit II (I don't know about Chess Tiger 14.0 yet), using ERT (24Mb of hash for >>>>both the engines, and a book prepared by me for Yace). >>>> >>>>I've redone the same match (overwriting learning of Yace and Gambit) with >>>>SelSafety=12 (too much seems to be at the contrary overproductive) and the >>>>result has been 82% vs 28% in favor of Gambit. Now, I don't think 400 games and >>>>a so large difference is a casuality. >>>> >>>>I've also done the complete Nunn test against Fritz6b (sorry, don't have Deep >>>>Fritz) and also in the Sveshnikov, where GT seems to have big problems against >>>>Fritz, with SelSafety=12 it was able to win with white and draw with black, >>>>where with the default settings it lost with both white and black. >>>> >>>>Well, I've not had the time to test further this theory, but maybe, Christophe, >>>>with your home-made benchmarks, you could tell if my theory is wrong or not. >>>>Just my little 2$ on a thing I've noticed (for a casuality). >>>> >>>>Now I'm actually testing with Junior and Hiarcs, next with Chessmaster (Kurt and >>>>default settings). >>>> >>>>In the end a question: in the Chessbase version there's a ct.ini? I hope so, >>>>since I have only a computer and it's a real pain to enter the moves manually >>>>for engine vs engine matches. >>>> >>>>Sincerely, >>>>Fabio. >>> >>>Fabio, you are correct with your theory I just finished testing 100 games >>>against Deep Fritz at 40\10min and your settings is solid, but it only won by a >>>very small margin. >>> >>PS: I meant to write 10 games instead of 100 games. >> >>>Pichard. > >But after 10 games he is correct?. > >Sarah. Sarah what I meant by saying that he was correct is that the playing strength is not too significant, but with the default settings at that time control using my AMD Athlon 800 MHz, Deep Fritz is slightly better, whereas, using his small adjustment Gambit Tiger II after 44 games is leading by 4 games. I am still testing it right now. Pichard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.