Author: Peter Berger
Date: 11:39:16 04/21/01
I have been very dissatisfied with the Gambit Tiger since I upgraded it to 2.0 .
Suddenly it seemed to be a rather clawless beast - dangerous,strong, but boring
.
This afternoon I changed the style to "agressive" at last out of frustration . (
I also changed SelSafety to 12 which at least didn't seem to hurt ) .
Suddenly the Tiger is back on the hunt !
Enjoy this great game :
( Game played on 2 PIII 500 , 128 MB RAM , Game in 1 hour )
[Event "60 0"]
[Site "D10 QGD Slav Defense"]
[Date "2001.04.21"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Bringer1.8"]
[Black "Gambit Tiger 2.0 spezial "]
[Result "0-1"]
1. d4 { 0.00 0:00:00.0 } d5 2. c4 { 0.00 0:00:00.0 } c6 3. e3 { 0.00
0:00:00.0 }
Bf5 4. cxd5 { 0.00 0:00:00.0 } cxd5 5. Qb3 { 0.00 0:00:00.0 }
Qc7 6. Bb5+ { 0.00 0:00:00.0 } Nd7 7. Nc3 { 0.00 0:00:00.0 }
e6 8. Bd2 { 0.00 0:00:00.0 } Ne7 9. Rc1 { 0.00 0:00:00.0 }
Nc6 10. Na4 { 0.00 0:00:00.0 } Rc8 11. Ne2 { 0.00 0:00:00.0 }
Be7 12. O-O { 0.00 0:00:00.0 } O-O 13. Nf4 { 0.00 0:00:00.0 }
Ndb8 14. Bd3 { 0.00 0:00:00.0 } Bxd3 15. Nxd3 { 0.00 0:00:00.0 }
Bd6 16. g3 { 0.00 0:00:00.0 } Qe7 17. Nc3 { 0.00 0:00:00.0 }
a6 18. Ne2 {-0.31/13 0:01:18.1 } Rc7 19. Rc2 {-0.31/12 0:01:08.8 (PB:
0:01:08.8 ) }
Qf6 20. Bb4 {-0.30/13 0:01:08.1 } Bxb4 21. Nxb4 {-0.18/15 0:01:44.0 (PB:
0:00:58.1 ) }
Na5 22. Qd3 {-0.08/14 0:01:01.7 (PB: 0:01:01.7 ) } Nbc6 23. Nxc6 {-0.01/15
0:01:34.0 }
Nxc6 24. Qa3 {-0.01/15 0:01:38.5 (PB: 0:00:04.3 ) } Qf3 25. Rfc1 { 0.00/14
0:01:39.0 (PB: 0:01:38.9 ) }
g5 26. Qd6 { 0.00/14 0:01:57.9 } Rcc8 27. Qd7 { 0.18/14 0:01:20.2 }
Rb8 28. a3 { 0.12/14 0:01:03.4 (PB: 0:01:03.2 ) } h5 29. Qd6 { 0.01/13
0:01:08.0 }
Rfe8 30. h3 { 0.05/13 0:01:29.5 } Kg7 31. a4 { 0.07/11 0:00:55.4 }
Rbd8 32. Qc7 { 0.00/13 0:00:56.3 } Re7 33. Qb6 {-0.11/13 0:00:51.4 }
Rh8 34. Kf1 {-0.06/13 0:02:14.9 (PB: 0:02:14.8 ) } h4 35. Ng1 { 0.05/14
0:01:07.7 (PB: 0:01:07.7 ) }
Qe4 36. g4 {-0.08/13 0:00:48.9 (PB: 0:00:48.9 ) } f5 37. gxf5 {-0.19/13
0:00:55.0 }
exf5 38. b4 {-0.07/12 0:02:20.6 } f4 39. exf4 {-0.65/13 0:05:31.8 }
g4 40. Qc5 {-0.58/11 0:03:41.2 } gxh3 41. Nxh3 {-1.38/10 0:00:46.5 (PB:
0:00:46.5 ) }
Qh1+ 42. Ng1 {-3.96/1 0:01:09.9 (PB: 0:01:09.9 ) } h3 43. f3 {-3.98/12
0:01:06.2 }
Rg8 44. Qxd5 {-4.78/10 0:00:43.3 (PB: 0:00:43.2 ) } Kh8 45. Qh5+ {-6.46/10
0:00:37.1 (PB: 0:00:37.0 ) }
Rh7 46. Qg4 {-14.35/11 0:00:41.7 (PB: 0:00:41.6 ) } Rxg4 47. fxg4 {-12.55/11
0:00:42.3 (PB: 0:00:12.2 ) }
h2 48. Kf2 {-Matt in 8/10 0:00:12.6 (PB: 0:00:03.7 ) }
0-1
I don't think White played weak at all ( _hard_ to spot the decisive mistake) -
Black played like a tiger though ;-)
Greetings.
pete
PS : To be fair I'd like to add another marvellous one played this weekend by
the opponent - watch Nimzo getting beaten like a step..... :-) ( same conditions
) :
[Event "Computer chess game"]
[Site "pete's compi"]
[Date "2001.04.21"]
[Round "-"]
[White "WbNimzo2000b"]
[Black "Bringer 1.8"]
[Result "0-1"]
[TimeControl "3600"]
1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Qxd5 3. Nc3 Qa5 4. d4 Nf6 5. Nf3 Bf5 6. Bc4 e6 7. Bd2 c6
8. Qe2 Bb4 9. Ne5 Nbd7 10. Nxd7 Nxd7 11. a3 Nf6 12. O-O-O Bxc3 13. Bxc3 Qd8
14. d5 cxd5 15. Bxf6 Qxf6 16. Bxd5 O-O 17. Bxb7 Rab8 18. Qa6 Rfc8 19. Rd2
Rc7 20. Rhd1 h5 21. Qa5 Rbxb7 22. Rd8+ Kh7 23. c3 Qg5+ 24. R1d2 Qxg2 25.
Qe5 Qg1+ 26. Rd1 Qxf2 27. R1d2 Qf1+ 28. Rd1 Qc4 29. b4 Qb3 30. R1d3 Qxa3+
31. Kd1 Rxb4 32. Ke2 Qc1 33. Rd1 Qc2+ 34. R8d2 Re4+ 35. Kf2 Rxe5 36. Rxc2
Bxc2 37. Rd2 Rxc3 38. h3 Rf5+ 39. Ke1 Rff3 40. h4 Bd3 41. Ra2 Rc1+ 42. Kd2
Rh1 43. Ra5 Bc4 44. Rxh5+ Kg8 45. Re5 Rh2+ 46. Kd1 Rf1+ 47. Re1 Bb3+ 48.
Kc1 Rxe1#
{Black mates} 0-1
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.