Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: For all Chess Tiger Fans ... the theme is not Chess Tiger ... sorry!

Author: Duncan Stanley

Date: 13:31:03 04/21/01

Go up one level in this thread


On April 21, 2001 at 16:18:19, Mogens Larsen wrote:

>On April 21, 2001 at 15:06:24, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>It is not Champion vs Champion. It is clearly best prog vs Kramnik. This is how
>>Enrique describes it in an email he sent to me. To be honest, he says (I hope I
>>do not break any good taste rule by quoting this) that the choice has been made
>>with:
>>
>>" 1) SMP
>>  2) Strength "
>>
>>in mind.
>>
>>So it's clearly about strength, and in this case ignoring Chess Tiger sounds
>>extremely arbitrary.
>>
>>I could have provided a SMP version if I had a chance to do so, but I can't do
>>that if I am informed that I am allowed to enter 2 or 3 days before the event.
>>
>>I think it's so obvious. Am I getting paranoid, or have I just been left out of
>>this arbitrarily???
>
>Even though the event is obviously intended to give the impression that the
>programs chosen are the best ones available, the press release itself doesn't
>specifically say that the purpose of the event is to find the strongest program.
>But the best of the ones invited. Semantics, I know, because everyone knows what
>impression BGN wishes to sell to sponsers and the seriousness of the selection
>process involved (non existant).
>
>If they wanted to sell this as an attempt to find the strongest program, they
>should have announced that authors with a SMP program could apply. Just adding
>Tiger, Rebel or both wouldn't have been enough. As long as they cut out the
>strongest claim from press releases, they can invite anyone they please IMO.
>It's discriminatory and unfair, but it's their right.
>
>Regards,
>Mogens

*If* the programmers were 'united'. *If* the programmers had an organisation
that was in their interests. *If* the programmers had the confidence.

*Then* they, as a group, could exploit potential lucrative situations to their
cumulative benefit and to the benefit of computer chess.

But all they want is to 'win', individually. So they let a bunch of charlatans
exploit them.

This won't change.

End of story.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.