Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 13:23:05 04/04/98
Go up one level in this thread
On April 04, 1998 at 14:02:06, Thorsten Czub wrote: >No - I will not explain this analogy. It is too obvious to explain it. >(I give a hint: chess base = malboro.) Thorsten: let's put it differently. You are explicitely accusing ChessBase and CSS of cheating and lying. Without proof, it is called defamation. You have shown no proof of your suspicions, which in this case you should have kept to yourself. You are explicitely calling stupid a number of people. This is not a discussion anymore. This is exclusively personal name calling on your part. And Bruce is right: this should not be allowed in CCC. Therefore, please prove your points or stay quiet about them until you do have proof. Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.