Author: Scott Carmichael
Date: 13:41:08 04/04/98
Go up one level in this thread
While the politics of who is and isn't on the board here is out of my limited knowledge, I must agree with Bruce. I have felt that many of the remarks posted here by Mr. Czub have been rahter derogatory towards me, and many others as well as being slanderous towards more than one company/software publisher. I ,regrettably, resorted to the same tactics as Mr. Czub, although I did continue to ask for proof of his claims against the other parties, so as to alow him a chance to justify his remarks. He has constantly failed to do so, and has even refused a simple matchup between his program of choice and Fritz 5 on ICC, where the public could follow the games with their own software, thus allowing them to have verifiable proof of thier own without the need for posting the games and taking up space here. At this point, I again apologize for wasting the space that should be used for useful topics, and I make a personal vow not to respond to any more of Thorstens remarks, regardless of how hard he tries to further insult me or my belief in statistical evidence, which has in his opinion indicated that I am a staunch materialist. Again I would offer anyone who believes Thorstens remarks to play either myself or Mark Young on ICC using the aforementioned methods to determine some facts ( although I have not talked to Mark, I'm sure he would love to have this opportunity).
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.