Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 03:05:26 04/22/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 22, 2001 at 04:37:58, Uri Blass wrote: >These results is from the nunn match(both programs used 64 mbytes hash and most >of the tablebases) > >Tiger14(depth 3)-Deep Fritz(depth 3) 16.5-3.5 >Tiger14(depth 4)-Deep Fritz(depth 4) 7.5-12.5 >Tiger14(depth 5)-Deep Fritz(depth 5) 13-7 >Tiger14(depth 6)-Deep Fritz(depth 6) 14-6 >Tiger14(depth 7)-Deep Fritz(depth 7) 13.5-6.5 >Tiger14(depth 8)-Deep Fritz(depth 8) 10.5-9.5 >Tiger14(depth 9)-Deep Fritz(depth 9) 14-6 >Tiger14(depth 10)-Deep Fritz(depth 10) 9.5-10.5 > >Tiger14(depth 4)-Deep Fritz(depth 3) 17.5-2.5 >Tiger14(depth 5)-Deep Fritz(depth 4) 19-1 >Tiger14(depth 6)-Deep Fritz(depth 5) 18-2 > >Tiger14(depth 3)-Deep Fritz(depth 4) 6-14 > >Tiger14(depth 4)-Deep Fritz(depth 5) 8-12(this result should be 12.5-7.5 but >deep fritz failed to mate because of having only part of the tablebases and the >engines agreed to a draw in a position that the evaluation was mate against >tiger). > >Tiger14(depth 5)-Deep Fritz(depth 6) 7-13 > >We need more games to get rating for programs at fixed depth. >It will be interesting to get a nunn rating listfor chess programs at fixed >depth in order to find out if there is diminishing return in the nunn match. > >In the game that Deep fritz drew because of not having the right tablebases Deep >Fritz has a position of king and 2 pawns for king and a bishop. > >Deep Fritz had the KPP vs KB and also the KNP vs KB tablebases but had not the >KQP vs KB tablebases so it promoted the pawn to a knight. > >Deep Fritz did not promote the second pawn to a queen or a rook because of not >having the KQB vs KN or the KRB vs KN tablebases. > >Uri Why don't you play three games both at depth 21 and post the games, here at the CCC. I am just curious to see Deep Fritz analysis at that depth. Pichard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.