Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 15:26:15 04/04/98
Go up one level in this thread
On April 03, 1998 at 17:07:55, Moritz Berger wrote: >On April 03, 1998 at 14:29:42, Thorsten Czub wrote: > > >>Nice theories you have. My published DRAW game does not look like a >>theoretical DRAW, or ? > >But it's not quite uncommon that a game with 26 moves from a book with >human chess theory (both programs stayed in book that long in your game) >ends in a draw ... Nothing scientific (you seem to like that term), just >an observation you surely agree upon ... > >Moritz As Ernst has shown, the game is a win for white. The latest executable (cstwhite) on the server of chris with the fixed draw bug (if it is really "fixed") would have played the right moves. So - how can you say it is a draw ? IMO if you call this game boring or normal or typical draw game I would say you should reevaluate your draw-terms. :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.