Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:07:29 04/23/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 23, 2001 at 04:56:19, Ed Schröder wrote: >On April 22, 2001 at 19:02:22, Mogens Larsen wrote: > >>On April 22, 2001 at 17:37:37, Ed Schröder wrote: >> >>>The current single cpu Tiger beats everything, even the available "Deeps" >>>something that impossibly can be ignored. A SMP Tiger has been offered and >>>the answer is still NO. This is unaccpetable. >> >>Ed, >> >>I think you're making a fool of yourself by campaigning for the Tiger like this. >>Unadulterated selfishness isn't a pretty sight and that is how it looks. Please, >>reconsider what you're planning to do. Not for my sake, but for your own. >> >>Regards, >>Mogens > > >After a good night rest I am ready to follow your advice. It is not that >I am so afraid for my image, that is not the case. It is more based on >the fact that I don't want to spoil the fun of the match people will have >regardless which program will play. > >Fact remains, there is a SMP Tiger, it was offered to them and they did not >take it. That is my final word on this case. I am interested to know what is the speed improvement of the SMP tiger from 2 processors and from 8 processors. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.