Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 14:11:25 04/23/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 23, 2001 at 15:22:29, Albert Silver wrote: >My attention was drawn to the following article published in Wired on the match >and tournament: > >http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,43203,00.html > >More of the same nonsense rehashed: > >- "the top four challengers in the world", not mentioning why these are the top >four challengers. > >- "so that left Deep Fritz, Deep Junior and a program called Shredder..." > >Sigh. You'd think DF and DJ were the automatic heirs here (they are presented as >by-names) and Shredder was some obscure complete ousider (it needs to be >explained there is such a program). Pity, you'd hope that at least one >publication would get this right without all the lopsided bias heaped here. Good link, Albert. There are a few nonsensical comments as you mention, but at least everyone's point of view is represented as far as I can tell. Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.