Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 20:19:39 04/23/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 23, 2001 at 11:33:52, Bas Hamstra wrote: >On April 23, 2001 at 11:03:32, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: > >It is easy to check out where it goes wrong, by comparing the values with and >without FP. Values are in my case mostly different when the capture is checking. >Also in the endgame it is risky, when for instance a pawncapture brings the king >out of the "square of the pawn". > >In my case it does not matter much, because you will get a cut anyway the next >ply. It saves a call to ab/evaluate, that's about it. I can't see how that gives >enourmous gains. And it doesn't in my case. > > >Bas. What it does is cut the total q-search nodes by 1/2 at least. That is a pretty significant savings...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.