Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 10:31:15 04/24/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 24, 2001 at 02:28:50, Ed Schröder wrote: >On April 24, 2001 at 01:06:52, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>>>He said they'ld kill me. >> >> >>>Chris, >> >>>Welcome back in the first place. It would be nice that one of the moderators >>>once and for all put an end to the ban of your name. Maybe we then can all >>>make a fresh new start again. >>> >>>Personally I have never seen you as an outsider. >>> >>>Ed >> >>how can chris answer to your question when his account is again deleted. >> >>oh man. >> >>a kindergarden. > > >Thorsten, > >If you read my posting then you will see I was looking for a solution and >not for counter arguments. Of course it takes two to tango if you want a >solution. > >I have no idea about the current status of Chris account wether it is blocked >or not, but for a new start it does not matter. This whole case is something >that goes back to 1996/1997 and it is time to stop it. > >So my suggestion is, no discussions with respect to content, just give Chris >what he wants and then it is up to him if takes the opportunity and post >under his real name. > >Ed I think that Chris could contribute if that's what he was interested in doing, but he's not. He's here for sport, and the sport involves hurting people. Last year there was a Chris eruption and it wasn't taken care of very quickly, and I complained to the moderators about it. "Why is he allowed to post if he's banned?" was my argument. This time, when it became apparent that he was here, I needed to be consistent with that position. Chris was allowed to post under his own name during the time of Tom. He was here for a bit, but it wasn't any fun for him, so he made some derisive comment about the quality of the posts here, and posted his name and password, which presumably caused the moderators to have to shut the account down before someone else got into it. I don't think he wants to post under his own name. I think he prefers things to be the way they are now. He gets to behave very naturally (for him) while telling everyone how oppressed he is. The guy is a malevolent pain in the ass, and if he's allowed to post here within the next six months, under his own name or under a pseudonym, it will be either without my knowledge or over my objection. I mean you no offense at all, but if you would like to rehabilitate him, I suggest that you accept my nomination next time, win the election (which you would do easily), and try this program early in your term, so you are the one who has to deal with the disaster. bruce
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.