Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: About Rules and Flames

Author: Fernando Villegas

Date: 13:33:30 04/05/98

Go up one level in this thread


Hi Ed:
Your post, as always, is a jewell of well pondered thought an
equilibrium, but creates some new problems. You mentioned it: where is
the threshold?   I have read enterely the thread about the issue of the
german magazines accused of being a liar and all the rest and althought
there are here and there some expresions that can be dimed as maybe
somewhat  strong, there is nothing so extraordinarely harsh as to do an
issue about it. In the dilemma between suffering flames and a cluster of
rules stablishing directly or not how many times you can be harsh, I
prefer the first thing. I don't care if anybody insult me. I can launch
my own broadside. I am adult enough and I have a very hardened skin. I
don't need to be protected by anybody and nobody needs it. Problem with
rules is that at last they are enforced and the result is or nothing or
an increasing lose of interesting people. First it was that german guy,
rolf I believe, that was insultant, yes, but interesting to read in some
of the topics he wrote about. And then was Chris W, one of the most
witty guys that has written here.   What's next? Maybe me because my bad
joke about my suicide? There are already people talking of that.
Ed, we can hold it. We can forgive or understand. All of us know that in
the excitment of writting you write many times things you really don't
think. And even if somebody is willing to persist in his attacks for
many weeks, so what? Nobody is coerced to read nothing. But
rules...,well, 1984 is not far ahead.
Fernando



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.