Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is this appropriate for this group?

Author: mick adams

Date: 18:15:43 04/05/98

Go up one level in this thread


On April 04, 1998 at 16:41:08, Scott Carmichael wrote:

> While the politics of who is and isn't on the board here is out of my
>limited knowledge, I must agree with Bruce. I have felt that many of the
>remarks posted here by Mr. Czub have been rahter derogatory towards me,
>and many others as well as being slanderous towards more than one
>company/software publisher. I ,regrettably, resorted to the same tactics
>as Mr. Czub, although I did continue to ask for proof of his claims
>against the other parties, so as to alow him a chance to justify his
>remarks. He has constantly failed to do so, and has even refused a
>simple matchup between his program of choice and Fritz 5 on ICC, where
>the public could follow the games with their own software, thus allowing
>them to have verifiable proof of thier own without the need for posting
>the games and taking up space here.
>   At this point, I again apologize for wasting the space that should be
>used for useful topics, and I make a personal vow not to respond to any
>more of Thorstens remarks, regardless of how hard he tries to further
>insult me or my belief in statistical evidence, which has in his opinion
>indicated that I am a staunch materialist.
>   Again I would offer anyone who believes Thorstens remarks to play
>either myself or Mark Young on ICC using the aforementioned methods to
>determine some facts ( although I have not talked to Mark, I'm sure he
>would love to have this opportunity).



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.