Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:15:47 04/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 25, 2001 at 02:42:16, Tanya Deborah wrote: > > >Here is a little interview about * Kramnik-Junior 6 game * in the past Dortmund >GM tournament in where Kramnik beat Junior in a very easy way. > >Please read this : > > >ChessBase: Did you prepare for today’s game? > >Kramnik: Yes, it was generally my plan to get the computer into time trouble so >it would blunder something... > >CB: And seriously? >Kramnik: Okay, I played some training games with Fritz, and I tried all kinds of >setups, because to go for the main lines against the computer makes no sense at >all – you simply forget something and the computer never does this at all. That >is why you have to find an interesting setup where the computer can go wrong. I >tried several different things and finally decided that this setup is the best: >Stonewall, 1.d4 d5 2.e3 and then the computer always plays 2...Nf6 and after >3.Bd3 it is very good that the computer plays 3...e6. It is okay but it gives >you very pleasant type of play against the computer. Then you go 4.f4 and >finally you get what you want. I tried several setups, as I already mentioned, >but in this setup the computer was doing extremely badly. In one training game I >mated the computer very similar to this, even faster. I think in 25 moves. > > >CB: So actually you got what you wanted in the first four moves. > >Kramnik: That’s not the end of the story. I didn’t get any advantage out of the >opening, maybe my position was even slightly worse, but I was happy with it, >because it is exactly the position you need to get against the computer. The >objective evaluation doesn’t really matter so much. I expected the computer to >go wrong at some point and it did so. 13...g6 and 15...Nxd2 were very bad. But >it was very natural. In fact when I was backstage during the game I mentioned to >Piket that I think the computer will play Nxd2 at some point, because this is an >aweful positional move. And finally in two or three move the computer took on >d2. I simply understand the mentality of the computer and that is why I am so >successful. > >******************** > >The Interview is very CLEAR. > >I think, that the program that play against Kramnik in October will need to have >more than a Super fast computer. I think that it will be very good to make a >Special opening book to avoid some unknown openings that Kramnik will have >prepare for the machine. A new opening book-with some help by GrandMasters to >know how to play better against the best Anti computer technique by Kramnik. > >Kramnik will know very good the program and he will prepare for a secure win. Software changes are allowed but unfortunately I am not optimistic about big changes in 3 monthes. I hope that kramnik is not going to get the same Deep Junior that is leading 2-0 against Deep Fritz(assuming that Deep Junior is going to be the winner against Deep Fritz). I believe that Deep Junior has almost no chance if kramnik is going to get the same deep Junior without tricks that were suggested here. I believbe that seeing the games of Deep Junior against deep Fritz is enough information for kramnik. Kasparov had not this kind of information when he played against Deeper blue. He had not games of software that is always the same as deeper blue except slightly faster hardware(I believe that the winner is going to use hardware that is not more than 4 time faster than the hardware that Enrique is using for the games). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.