Author: Robert Raese
Date: 00:58:15 04/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 25, 2001 at 03:50:05, Robert Raese wrote: >On April 24, 2001 at 18:40:56, Mogens Larsen wrote: > >>On April 24, 2001 at 18:26:34, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On April 24, 2001 at 18:11:35, Eran wrote: >>> >>>I'm pretty sure that i read a posting from Stefan that shredder is >>>out of that circus, so i assume that Shredder is not going to play >>>kramnik anyway. >> >>Yeah, that one is gone with the wind even without Ossi Weiner as Rhett Butler. >> >>>My assumption is that it is going to be junior as it is 2-0 ahead >>>now which is quite an advantage. And if it's smart it is repeating >>>the same game next game, so fritz must find a sideline now. >> >>Having a 2-0 advantage is quite good considering that they're only playing 24 >>games all in all. > > >really 2-0 doesn't mean much. i don't see how this is any different from the >matches played on ICC or FICS... you may lose 4 in a row, then turn around and >win 8 of the next 15 games... alot of it can be due to books, and engine >learning... i think its alot more volitile than human chess... anyway, when it's >game 19 game and junior is still up 2-0, then i'll say fritz is cooked. fritz >could turn around and dominate this matchup. hmm... i just re-read what i wrote and i may have been unclear... i was thinking about for example the kramnik-kasparov match where almost every game was drawn... and what i meant was that if this series comes down to the final two games, and junior has the only full wins of the series, THEN i'll say fritz is cooked. usually though computer matchups don't produce long strings of draws like that unless you're playing an engine against itself......
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.