Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 13:30:12 04/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 25, 2001 at 16:05:08, Fernando Villegas wrote: >The sequence CSTL-Gambit- DT must not be interpreted as a sequence in time and >in strenght. Different reasearchs begin in different moments and get completion >at different times. But I think it is no chance that so mighty programs are >aiming at a similar kind of attacking-speculartive playing, each time better and >better. >regards >Fernando thats pretty normal for a paradigm shift. suddenly, all over the world, without big logical or casual reason, similar things happen. and suddenly the new point of view is an established point of view, as if it has ever been the case. thats the way paradigms change. good that we have the chance to watch how this happens. it is unimportant if christophe or amir or chris have talked together or copied from each other. important is that they have seen the same thing as if it was to be seen in the air. morphogenetic fields :-))) or : what happens when 2 particles have opposite spin. they are connected.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.