Author: joe dean
Date: 03:54:52 04/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 25, 2001 at 22:27:07, Laurence Chen wrote: >On April 25, 2001 at 16:30:12, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On April 25, 2001 at 16:05:08, Fernando Villegas wrote: >> >>>The sequence CSTL-Gambit- DT must not be interpreted as a sequence in time and >>>in strenght. Different reasearchs begin in different moments and get completion >>>at different times. But I think it is no chance that so mighty programs are >>>aiming at a similar kind of attacking-speculartive playing, each time better and >>>better. >>>regards >>>Fernando >> >>thats pretty normal for a paradigm shift. >> >>suddenly, all over the world, without big logical or casual reason, >>similar things happen. and suddenly the new point of view is an established >>point of view, as if it has ever been the case. >> >>thats the way paradigms change. >> >>good that we have the chance to watch how this happens. >> >>it is unimportant if christophe or amir or chris have talked together >>or copied from each other. >> >>important is that they have seen the same thing as if it was to be seen >>in the air. >> >>morphogenetic fields :-))) >> >>or : what happens when 2 particles have opposite spin. they are connected. >No they don't, if both particles happen to travel in the same path, they collide >and repel each other. You should stick with chess and leave the realm of >physics for others. >Regards, >Laurence I believe Thorsten is referring to an anomoly in physics where two particles, massively disconnected in space, are able to communicate with each other instantaneously. This contravenes the Einsteinian paradigm that information cannot flow faster than the speed of light (or that information cannot flow instantaneously). He will stick with both chess and physics. One hopes. New ideas.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.