Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 06:40:48 04/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 26, 2001 at 03:51:02, Tanya Deborah wrote: > > >Hi Bob! > >You are right!, The stonewall is almost always a killer opening for a computer >program. It is a pity that it was hopeless to fix. I think that a very big >opening book that try to avoid all the StoneHall positions may be help. I dont >know, it is dificult to say, but the clear point is that the programmers will >try to avoid it when Kramnik play with white. If not, the program will not have >any chance to win. It isn't just a black problem. Human GMs do the same thing when playing black if white allows it. And the computers handle it so badly that the GM will be willing to lose a tempo or two to reach such easy-to-handle positions if they get a chance. > >In ICC i saw JRLOK playing very good games in this way, Also GOLDMUND is really >amazing when he play against some programs in ICC !! > >GOLDMUND is a GM Russian player named Alexander Rustemov! This player is so >incredible!; I think that is one of the best Anti-computer players of the world. >I love his matches against Scrappy, he play moves like e3 and then f4!, or c3! >and win sometimes! > My only remaining Stonewall problem is the book. It is possible to trick crafty into a stonewall while still in book, which means the evaluation things I have done are ineffective. I am working on this... >JRLOK, is also AMAZING!! against computers! But i dont know who is him... Do >you know something about him?? Yes I do. :) > >Thanks Bob! > >Regards, > >Tanya, D
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.