Author: Uri Blass
Date: 10:53:51 04/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 26, 2001 at 10:52:37, Wayne Lowrance wrote: >On April 26, 2001 at 10:12:47, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On April 26, 2001 at 10:06:46, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>Tiger14(depth3)'s results: >>> >>>Deep fritz depth 3: 34.5-15.5(3 draws in the match) >>>Deep Fritz depth 4: 18-32(4 draws in the match) >>>Deep Fritz depth 5: 9.5-40.5(9 draws in the match) >>>Deep Fritz depth 6: 5.5-44.5(5 draws) >>>Deep Fritz depth 7: 2-48(4 draws) >>>Deep Fritz depth 8: 0.5-49.5 >>> >>> >>>Tiger14(depth 4)'s results: >>> >>>Deep Fritz depth 3: 42.5-7.5(3 draws) >>>Deep Fritz depth 4: 35.5-14.5(7 draws) >>>Deep Fritz depth 5: 23-27(12 draws) >>>Deep Fritz depth 6: 11.5-38.5(7 draws) >>>Deep Fritz depth 7: 4-46(2 draws) >>>Deep Fritz depth 8: 1-49(no draws) >>> >>>Tiger14 depth5's results: >>> >>>Deep Fritz depth 3: 47.5-2.5(3 draws) >>>Deep Fritz depth 4: 40.5-9.5(3 draws) >>>Deep Fritz depth 5: 29.5-20.5(17 draws) >>>Deep Fritz depth 6: 23.5-26.5(7 draws) >>>Deep Fritz depth 7: 17.5-32.5(5 draws) >>>Deep Fritz depth 8: 6.5-43.5(7 draws) >>> >>>Tiger14 depth6's results: >>> >>>Deep Fritz depth 3: 49.5-0.5 >>>Deep Fritz depth 4: 46-4(2 draws) >>>Deep Fritz depth 5: 41.5-8.5(5 draws) >>>Deep Fritz depth 6: 27-23(16 draws) >>>Deep Fritz depth 7: 19.5-30.5(5 draws) >>>Deep Fritz depth 8: 12.5-37.5(9 draws) >>> >>>Tiger14 depth7's results: >>> >>>Deep Fritz(depth 3) 48.5-1.5(1 draw) >>>Deep Fritz(depth 4) 46-4 (6 draws) >>>Deep Fritz(depth 5) 43-7 (6 draws) >>>Deep Fritz(depth 6) 37-13 (12 draws) >>>Deep Fritz(depth 7) 28.5-21.5(9 draws) >>>Deep Fritz(depth 8) 22-28(14 draws) >>> >>>Deep fritz's total scores: >>> >>>Depth 3:27.5 out of 250 >>>Depth 4:64 out of 250 >>>Depth 5:103.5 out of 250 >>>Depth 6:145.5 out of 250 >>>depth 7:178.5 out of 250 >>>depth 8:207.5 out of 250 >>> >>>Tiger's total scores: >>> >>>Depth 3:70 out of 300 >>>Depth 4:117.5 out of 300 >>>Depth 5:165 out of 300 >>>Depth 6:196 out of 300 >>>depth 7:225 out of 300 >>> >>>I do not know to translate the results to rating. >>>I think that the results suggest that there is no significant diminishing return >>>at these depthes. >> >>I guess that there is a program that can calculate rating based on the results >>and I am interesting to get the rating of the players. >> >>I know the linear formula but I think that it is a bad idea to use it because >>some matches were between programs when the rating difference is probably more >>than 400 and the weaker side scored points even at that matches. >> >>Uri > >I do not think I understand. How do I read "n out of m" ? n points from of m games , and "j-k" ? j points for the first program that is always Tiger. k points for the second program that is always Fritz I do not >see the relationship of n+n'? Does not seem to relate to m or m' I do not understand what you mean Where did I use n+n? Where did I use m or m'? Uri > >Thank you >Wayne
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.