Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: solving conflicts

Author: Thorsten Czub

Date: 13:08:59 04/26/01

Go up one level in this thread


IMO you cannot solve a conflict with both sides
arguing:

i am right. you are wrong.

no. you are wrong. i am right.

this does not help anyway...

instead we could see it the following way:

chris has been thrown out.

i don't care if he wants in or not.
but when he posts, i would appreciate that he can post with his name.
so that anybody knows WHO is the xyz that has posted this or that.
thats the main problem with an anonymous post: you don't know who
is the guy you don't like.

look. if chris was once a chess programmer, i think he has the right
to get an account here. and he has maybe the right to fuck off
when he wants. and come maybe back in a few years.

i don't think he is out for pissing on people.

we are all pissed off from time to time.
and in other times, we are very nice and kind and do senseful things.

but we should not, try to seperate people out only because we have different
opinion.

i would fight for bob, in the same way i would fight for chris or bruce,
i would fight for frederic to get his account back, and of course for amir.
i know that mogens is different opinion than i am, or chessfun.
but i would not like to see somebody throw them out.

because computerchess would be boring when only ONE point of view is posted.
or only ONE opinion is there.

i do not believe that computerchess will make progress when there is only
the political correct way to do it.

isn't it democracy to fight for the right of your opponent ?
when i feel that ossi weiner is right, and his enemies are wrong,
i say so. if he says something i don't like, i say so.
same counts for any other.

i am not biased for ONE person or against ONE person in general.
if somebody is discriminated for his personal ideals and point of views,
the whole group  and the whole community is shit.


tolerance is no one way street. not only the individual has to be tolerant.
also the group has to be tolerant.

are'nt we humans. can't we forgive ?
i can forgive even my deepest enemy. cause he might be an enemy, but he is still
a human beeing and all human rights count for HIM too.

so i don't see the problem. instead of arguing if somebody is right or not,
just give him what he wants, and thats it.

if somebody is hungry, i give him to eat. if somebody wants something to drink,
give it to him. if somebody wants to come in, let him.

i do not really see the problem. i think there is a kind of host-rules.

one of these rules is: try to be a human beeing.

in german (dialect from where i come from): "bleiben'se mensch!"


of course when somebody on your party is pissing on all people all the way,
i will throw him out. but i don't think chris is this kind of person.
i was on his birthday in england. it as very funny, like a peter greenaway
movie. a little bourgeois. but --- over all very nice.

i want to see him back. not because he has similar ideas i do have. but because
he has done a good job with cstal, and he is sometimes very funny and
good in making ideas and points clear.

i don't see him as a plague of this forum, like tueschen was for rgcc.

he is a chess programmer, and he has IMO the same right as marty hirsch or
mark uniacke or christophe theron or ed schroeder or bob hyatt or bruce moreland
or stefan meyer-kahlen has, the right to be in a group of other
chess programmers. all the gossip that people spread is unimportant for me.
for me counts in the end, how his chess program is.

you have to see the personal stuff and the chess program.
i can be FOR chrilly donninger but against his pre-processing nimzos.
and i can be FOR nimzo when the program plays better chess.
i like e.g. don daily, because he is a nice guy and gives something to
computerchess. i know many others too that have the same thing for me.
they make my day very interesting. chris is in this group.
i like to read his posts, especially when these posts are not too agressive
but interesting as the moves of cstal have been.

i like to read from others too. we once had interesting discussions in rgcc
about so many things. i don't know why this is impossible here.

where does all the hate and fear come from ?

there is nothing to lose.
we are ONE community.

no matter if you are tarrasch, lasker, steinitz or capablanca.
no matter if you are morsch, whittington, lang or meyer-kahlen.




This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.