Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 15:49:31 04/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 26, 2001 at 18:07:34, Uri Blass wrote: >On April 26, 2001 at 18:02:08, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On April 26, 2001 at 17:11:14, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >> >>> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Score >>>Deep Fritz 7 0 0 0 0 0 ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ 3.5 >>>Deep Junior 1 1 1 1 1 ½ ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ 7.5 >> >>Poor Fritz finally got a win. >> >>Interesting that for the second 5 games, Fritz actually outplayed Junior >>(3.5/2.5). > >The second 6 games(not 5 games) but it is not enough for Fritz. > >If it continues the 3.5-2.5 behaviour then it is going to win the next 12 games >7-5 and it means that the result is going to be 12.5-10.5 for Junior and that >Junior does not need the last game to be the winner of the match. Actually, I don't suggest that the behavior will follow either the first trend or the second one. In fact, I would not be astonished if Fritz should get a 5-0 segment. In any case, I think it is probably that Junior is better, but with such an itty-bitty sample, you just can't tell. Also, the outcome so far is amusing in the light of the "probability guesses" showing that Junior was dominatingly better. In the words of the good fairy godmother from Disney's "Cinderella": "Impossible things are happening every day."
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.