Author: Robert Raese
Date: 18:00:49 04/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 26, 2001 at 18:49:31, Dann Corbit wrote: >On April 26, 2001 at 18:07:34, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On April 26, 2001 at 18:02:08, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On April 26, 2001 at 17:11:14, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>> >>>> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Score >>>>Deep Fritz 7 0 0 0 0 0 ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ 3.5 >>>>Deep Junior 1 1 1 1 1 ½ ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ 7.5 >>> >>>Poor Fritz finally got a win. >>> >>>Interesting that for the second 5 games, Fritz actually outplayed Junior >>>(3.5/2.5). >> >>The second 6 games(not 5 games) but it is not enough for Fritz. >> >>If it continues the 3.5-2.5 behaviour then it is going to win the next 12 games >>7-5 and it means that the result is going to be 12.5-10.5 for Junior and that >>Junior does not need the last game to be the winner of the match. > >Actually, I don't suggest that the behavior will follow either the first trend >or the second one. In fact, I would not be astonished if Fritz should get a 5-0 >segment. In any case, I think it is probably that Junior is better, but with >such an itty-bitty sample, you just can't tell. > >Also, the outcome so far is amusing in the light of the "probability guesses" >showing that Junior was dominatingly better. > >In the words of the good fairy godmother from Disney's "Cinderella": >"Impossible things are happening every day." yes :) i have learned from ICC matches just because you lose 5 straight to an opponant, don't give up and think you have to adjust something yet... because soon enough you will beat him 5 straight... it goes in streaks and strings... alot to do with openings and engine learning i think... this match is far from over.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.