Author: Robert Raese
Date: 20:06:36 04/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 26, 2001 at 21:51:14, Christophe Theron wrote: >On April 26, 2001 at 19:56:29, Bertil Eklund wrote: > >> >>Hi! >> >>I want to ask you what size you recommend for hash and Tb with 256mb. >>Deep-Fritz and Tiger/Gambit are first out on the new hardware Athlon1200 256mb. >> >>Bertil > > > >Hi Bertil! > > > >So the SSDF is going to use A1200/256M from now on! That's news! > >On this computer I would recommend 192Mb hash tables and 32Mb TB cache. > >But please make sure that this setting does not slow the program down >dramatically. It depends on your system, so please try with for example one >middlegame position and one deep endgame position. > >Try with 64Mb HT and 192Mb HT. Set up the program to reach a fixed depth on your >middlegame position. If the NPS is almost the same with 64Mb and 192Mb, then >it's OK to use 192Mb HT. since chessassistant GUI does not report NPS, would measuring the time tiger takes to reach a certain ply depth, say d=13, give me the same information?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.