Author: Robert Raese
Date: 21:22:43 04/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 26, 2001 at 21:43:23, Christophe Theron wrote: >On April 26, 2001 at 20:38:18, Robert Raese wrote: > >>On April 26, 2001 at 20:36:25, Robert Raese wrote: >> >>>On April 26, 2001 at 20:15:47, Dan Andersson wrote: >>> >>>>That should be an easy one to answer, 192MB is maximum for Tiger and 16MB TBs >>>>are recommended. And thats way under 256 MB. >>> >>>i'd be interested to know how the figure 16MB was arrived at... if that is the >>>optimal setting for all time controls, or just for long games. i don't really >>>know the mechanism of how TBs are used by the program, so i'm wondering if >>>adding more RAM could help or even possibly hurt performance? >> >>* i meant adding more RAM to the TB cache. > > > >Well... My computer has only 96Mb RAM, so I cannot experiment up to 256Mb... > >But I think that adding TB cache will only increase performances, until you >reach a point where the OS has to swap data back to disk because your are using >more than the available RAM. how does the concept of "persistent hash" relate to this? also, if hash is persistent, does it persist between games, or just for the duration of the game? > > Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.