Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 00:08:02 04/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 26, 2001 at 23:06:36, Robert Raese wrote:
>On April 26, 2001 at 21:51:14, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On April 26, 2001 at 19:56:29, Bertil Eklund wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Hi!
>>>
>>>I want to ask you what size you recommend for hash and Tb with 256mb.
>>>Deep-Fritz and Tiger/Gambit are first out on the new hardware Athlon1200 256mb.
>>>
>>>Bertil
>>
>>
>>
>>Hi Bertil!
>>
>>
>>
>>So the SSDF is going to use A1200/256M from now on! That's news!
>>
>>On this computer I would recommend 192Mb hash tables and 32Mb TB cache.
>>
>>But please make sure that this setting does not slow the program down
>>dramatically. It depends on your system, so please try with for example one
>>middlegame position and one deep endgame position.
>>
>>Try with 64Mb HT and 192Mb HT. Set up the program to reach a fixed depth on your
>>middlegame position. If the NPS is almost the same with 64Mb and 192Mb, then
>>it's OK to use 192Mb HT.
>
>since chessassistant GUI does not report NPS, would measuring the time tiger
>takes to reach a certain ply depth, say d=13, give me the same information?
Yes it would.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.