Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 04:11:29 04/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 27, 2001 at 06:02:20, Uri Blass wrote: >I believe that it will be more interesting to get games of chess programs in >correspondence tournament instead of getting games of chess programs against the >world. > >you can get information about ICCF tournament at http://www.iccf.com > >It will be interesting if chess programs can win the email tournament inspite of >the fact that the opponents can use computers because of the important advantage >of having more time. > More than 90% of the opponents in this slow time control where Gambit Tiger II vs Web are using computers and have plenty of time to analyze a position. I don't see any diferenceat all. http://www.rebel.nl/gt2-web.htm Pichard. >The opponents usually have only one computer and do not use different computers >against different oponents so if we find enough volunteers to use chess programs >then they have chances to win the tournament. > >In the email ournament it is possible to get average of more than 144 hours per >move against every opponent(I say more than 144 hours per move because pondering >is possible). > >In the postal tournament (not by email) it is possible to get an average of more >than 72 hours per move and we only need enough volunteers to do it with good >hardware. > >I guess that winning the second tournament is more easy because people who do >not use email often also do not use computers. > >What is your guess for the rating of this monster when Deep Fritz or Deep Junior >on a dual or quad is used(it should also calculate when it is in book in order >to check if the book does not contain errors and play book moves only if the >score of the best book move is not significantly lower than the score of the >root position) > >My guess is that it can get an ICCF rating of 2600. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.