Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 04:57:09 04/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 27, 2001 at 06:22:13, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >The case of changing laws is an indication that the theory isn't complete. A >complete theory should be able to predict the way in which the "laws" change >with time, IMHO. That would be the normal way to evaluate a theory. It should be able to determine how the system evolves with time and when/if it breaks down. Even if the nature of the theory is probabilistic. Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.