Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 05:42:50 04/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 26, 2001 at 22:40:06, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>be 50 times faster. I doubt it could go faster than that.. > >Well hsu in an official paper thought different. He thinks even with >0.18 technology he can easily get as much NPS with 4 chess processors >where he needed 480 for with deep blue 2. > >See IEEE99 last few pages. > Vincent: 4*32M _is_ pretty close to what DB2 was searching. Particularly when you factor in much less search overhead for 4 than for 480 processors...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.